Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 8

Website: Sony Creative Software

Sony Vegas Movie Studio is an industry leading movie making application that offers support for a large variety of video formats. It can handle the latest multi-channel audio and high-definition content, even including AVCHD and HDV.

Further features include mixing and editing, video composite creating and video restoration among others.

Here we use the free version: Platinum 8, to transcode a 1080p High-Definition 5.1 Channel AC3 audio DivX file into a 720p WMV9HD in CBR Compression at 25 fps with the audio converted into 192Kbps, 48KHz, 16-bit Stereo WMA9. Overall, the bitrate equates to around 5Mbps.



Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 8

Transcoding of 1080p AVI, 5.1Ch AC3 into 5Mbit 720p WMV9HD 2Ch Stereo

  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 Overclock (3x3.0GHz 3.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 (3x2.4GHz 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • 351.0
  • 372.0
  • 379.0
  • 389.0
  • 407.0
  • 421.0
  • 426.0
  • 479.0
  • 496.0
  • 504.0
  • 521.0
  • 559.0
  • 579.0
  • 599.0
  • 604.0
  • 638.0
  • 659.0
  • 712.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Score

In Sony Vegas, the new Phenom X3 8750 delivers similar performance to the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, which comes with an 800MHz higher clock speed but one less core, proving that the number of cores does matter in this test as well. However, even despite this fact, the new X3 trails behind the higher-clocked dual-core Intel Core 2 Duo processors at its stock speed.

When overclocked, the deficit is made up, but we’re not factoring in how well Intel’s Core 2 Duo processors overclock as well – this means that the Phenom X3 8750 is pretty much nullified by the dual-core competition in this particular test.

Maxon Cinebench 10 x64

Website: Cinebench

Maxon Cinebench is based on Maxon's popular animation software, Cinema 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. We've used the built-in CPU benchmark, which uses a 3D scene file to render a photo-realistic image of a concept bike. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders.

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - xCPU, 800x600 Image

  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 Overclock (3x3.0GHz 3.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 (3x2.4GHz 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • 10671.0
  • 10159.0
  • 9863.0
  • 9517.0
  • 9192.0
  • 9136.0
  • 8900.0
  • 8743.0
  • 7566.0
  • 7250.0
  • 7192.0
  • 6624.0
  • 6361.0
  • 5902.0
  • 5891.0
  • 5615.0
  • 5215.0
  • 4808.0
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
Score

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - 1CPU, 800x600 Image

  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 Overclock (3x3.0GHz 3.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 (3x2.4GHz 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • 3873.0
  • 3669.0
  • 3453.0
  • 3351.0
  • 3287.0
  • 3096.0
  • 3079.0
  • 3042.0
  • 2846.0
  • 2825.0
  • 2785.0
  • 2715.0
  • 2705.0
  • 2697.0
  • 2568.0
  • 2499.0
  • 2480.0
  • 2479.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Score

Where the X3 9750 lacks in clock speed, it makes up in core count in Cinebench 10 – an application renowned for its parallelism. It manages to match—and even outperform—the dual-core competition from the blue corner and the overclock enables it to deliver similar performance to the slower quad-core Phenom processors in the xCPU test.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04